Postmodern Perspectives on Teaching Deaf Culture through Inclusive BISINDO Classrooms: Hearing Students Micro-Narratives

Authors

  • Bagus Dwi Bramantyo Universitas Gunadarma
  • Tuti Widiastuti Universitas Gunadarma
  • Yohanes Arie Kuncoroyakti Universitas Gunadarma

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54259/mukasi.v5i2.7409

Keywords:

Deaf Culture, BISINDO, Inclusive Education, Micro-Narratives, Postmodernism

Abstract

The shift from medical to socio cultural perspectives on disability has positioned Deaf culture as a legitimate form of knowledge. In this context, Indonesian Sign Language (BISINDO) serves not only as a communication tool but also as a key marker of Deaf identity and cultural transmission. This study explores how Deaf culture is taught in inclusive BISINDO classrooms organized by GERKATIN, focusing on hearing students’ experiences as forms of micro-narratives. Using a qualitative, constructivist approach and drawing on Jean François Lyotard’s postmodern theory, data were collected through interviews and observations involving four hearing students and one Deaf teacher. The findings show that BISINDO classrooms challenge dominant assumptions that prioritize spoken language. The use of visual communication creates moments of discomfort and adaptation for hearing students, which become important parts of the learning process. Students’ experiences reveal that learning Deaf culture produces diverse interpretations rather than a single meaning. Additionally, Deaf teachers are recognized as legitimate knowledge holders based on lived experience. Overall, the study highlights BISINDO classrooms as spaces that promote knowledge diversity and shift traditional power relations in education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdillah, M. F., & Andamisari, D. (2024). Strategi Komunikasi Komunitas Gerakan Kesejahteraan Tunarungu Indonesia Dalam Menyosialisasikan Bahasa Isyarat Indonesia di Jakarta. LUGAS Jurnal Komunikasi, 8(2), 200–209. https://doi.org/10.31334/lugas.v8i2.4727

Andrik Purwasito, D. E. A., & Rahmawati, A. (2025). Filsafat postmodernisme: Kritik, prinsip, dan relevansinya bagi pendidikan masa depan. Greenbook Publisher.

Baihaqi, A. F., & Sudikan, S. Y. (2022). Representasi budaya populer dalam film Cruella karya Craig Gillespie: Kajian postmodernisme J.F. Lyotard. Jurnal Sapala, 9(2), 13–28.

Bramantyo, B. D. , W. T. , K. Y. A. , & Y. K. (2025). The role of Gerkatin in educating Deaf culture through inclusive learning spaces in Bahasa Isyarat Indonesia (BISINDO) classes. Proceeding of the 5th ASPIKOM International Communication Conference (AICCON 2025) , 943–950. https://doi.org/10.31947/aiccon2025.v1i2.47995

Bramantyo, B. D., & Fitriani, D. R. (2019). Proses pembentukan self-esteem dan self-identity pada teman tuli di organisasi Gerkatin Depok. Wacana: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Komunikasi, 18(2), 191–202. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32509/wacana.v18i2.914

Clara, C. (2019). Adaptasi interaksi kegiatan belajar mengajar bahasa isyarat Indonesia di Pusbisindo Jakarta. Nyimak: Journal of Communication, 3(1), 77–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.31000/nyimak.v3i1.1226

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications.

Cue, K. R. (2025). Defining hearing culture in context of Deaf culture: A grounded theory examination. Disability & Society, 40(6), 1690–1713. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2024.2369649

Denzin, N. K. (2018). The qualitative manifesto: A call to arms. Routledge.

Erlina, E., & Syaifuddin, H. (2024). Implikasi postmodernisme dalam masyarakat kontemporer (Analisis paradigma pemikiran tokoh Jean Francois Lyotard). Refleksi: Jurnal Filsafat Dan Pemikiran Islam, 23(2), 310–338. https://doi.org/10.14421/ref.v23i2.5270

Fjord, L. L. (2003). Contested signs: Discursive disputes in the geography of the pediatric cochlear implant, language, kinship, and expertise. University of Virginia.

Gumelar, G., Hafiar, H., & Subekti, P. (2018). Konstruksi makna BISINDO sebagai budaya Tuli bagi anggota Gerkatin. Informasi, 48(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.21831/informasi.v48i1.17727

KemenPANRB. (2024). Upaya Wujudkan Pelayanan Publik Ramah Disabilitas Melalui Transformasi Digital. KemenPANRB. https://www.kemenkopmk.go.id/pemerintah-penuhi-hak-penyandang-disabilitas-di-indonesia

Lyotard, J. F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. University of Minnesota Press.

Mandasari, R., & Winduwati, S. (2022). Public relations efforts of Pusbisindo in promoting the use of Indonesian Sign Language among the public. Prologia, 6(2), 355–361.

Mayer, C. C., & Trezek, B. J. (2023). Communication, language, and modality in the education of Deaf students. Education Sciences, 13(10), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13101033

McDermid, C. (2020). Educational interpreters, Deaf students and inclusive education? Turkish Journal of Special Education Research and Practice, 2(1), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.37233/TRSPED.2020.0107

Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Natalia, K. A., & Winayanti, R. D. (2025). Strategi komunikasi simbolik dalam interaksi pelayanan yang dilakukan penyandang disabilitas di Difel Cafe Gantari Jaya. Mukasi: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 4(4), 1768–1778. https://doi.org/10.54259/mukasi.v4i4.5977

Ni’mah, S. N., & Rofiq, M. (2026). Pemikiran postmodernisme dan dampaknya terhadap budaya di era kontemporer. Jurnal Psikososial Dan Pendidikan, 2(1), 761–772.

O’Connell, N. (2024). Deaf people’s retrospective views and lived experiences of ableism and discrimination in education: A qualitative study informed by critical disability studies. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 26(1), 492–504. https://doi.org/10.16993/sjdr.1058

Oliver, M. (2013). The social model of disability: Thirty years on. Disability & Society, 28(7), 1024–1026. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2013.818773

Padden, C. A., & Humphries, T. (2006). Inside Deaf culture. Harvard University Press.

Rengganis, L. D. A., Suryana, A., Wahyudin, U., Yati, S. E., & Santoso, B. (2023). The experience of interacting: Learning communication for Deaf students. Bricolage: Jurnal Magister Ilmu Komunikasi, 9(1), 67–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.30813/bricolage.v9i1.3890

Rubiyanto, R., & Clara, C. (2019). Interaction adaptation in BISINDO teaching and learning activities at Pusbisindo Jakarta. Nyimak: Journal of Communication, 3(1), 77–96. https://doi.org/10.31000/nyimak.v3i1.1226

Slee, R. (2018). Inclusive education isn’t dead, it just smells funny. Routledge.

Smith, M. E., & Campbell, P. (1997). Discourses on Deafness: Social policy and the communicative habilitation of the Deaf. Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers Canadiens de Sociologie, 22(4), 437–456. https://doi.org/10.2307/3341692

Sugiyono. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Wijaya, J. A., & Riyanto, F. X. E. A. (2023). Etika tanggung jawab: Refleksi filosofis atas relasionalitas dan relevansinya dengan budaya Tuli. Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, 6(3), 415–424. https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v6i3.61020

Downloads

Published

2026-05-15

How to Cite

Bagus Dwi Bramantyo, Tuti Widiastuti, & Yohanes Arie Kuncoroyakti. (2026). Postmodern Perspectives on Teaching Deaf Culture through Inclusive BISINDO Classrooms: Hearing Students Micro-Narratives. MUKASI: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 5(2), 1008–1022. https://doi.org/10.54259/mukasi.v5i2.7409

Issue

Section

Articles