Capital Allocation Strategies for Fleet Decarbonization: A Financial Risk-Return Analysis of Alternative Fuel Investment Among Global Shipping Enterprises

Authors

  • Tri Kismantoro Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54259/manabis.v5i2.7277

Keywords:

capital allocation; fleet decarbonization; alternative fuels; financial risk; green shipping finance

Abstract

The global shipping industry's transition toward decarbonization demands unprecedented capital reallocation, compelling shipping enterprises to make high-stakes investment decisions under conditions of regulatory uncertainty, technological immaturity, and volatile fuel markets. This study investigates how global shipping companies develop capital allocation strategies for fleet decarbonization, with particular focus on the financial risk-return dynamics associated with investments in alternative fuels including liquefied natural gas (LNG), methanol, and ammonia propulsion systems. Employing a qualitative research design anchored in thematic analysis, the study engages thirty senior financial, operational, and strategic management professionals across global shipping enterprises, financial institutions, and maritime regulatory organizations. Findings reveal four strategic archetypes of decarbonization capital allocation and identify green financing instruments — including sustainability-linked bonds and green ship financing — as critical enablers of investment feasibility. The study advances maritime financial management scholarship by mapping the structural relationships between regulatory pressure, financial risk appetite, and capital strategy in the global decarbonization transition.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bilal, A., Xiao-ping, L., Nanli, Z., Sharma, R., & Jahanger, A. (2021). Green technology innovation, globalization, and CO2 emissions: Recent insights from the OBOR economies. Sustainability, 14(1), 236. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010236

Caldeirinha, V., Felício, J. A., Pinho, T., & Rodrigues, R. (2024). Fuzzy-set QCA on performance and sustainability determinants of ports supporting floating offshore wind farms. Sustainability, 16(7), 2947. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072947

Caldas, P., Pedro, M. I., & Marques, R. C. (2024). An assessment of container seaport efficiency determinants. Sustainability, 16(11), 4427. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114427

Chae, G.-Y., An, S.-H., & Lee, C.-Y. (2021). Demand forecasting for liquified natural gas bunkering by country and region using meta-analysis and artificial intelligence. Sustainability, 13(16), 9058. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169058

Du, S., Zhang, H. S., & Kong, Y. (2023). Sustainability implications of the Arctic shipping route for Shanghai port logistics in the post-pandemic era. Sustainability, 15(22), 16017. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152216017

Kim, B., Kim, G., & Kang, M.-H. (2022). Study on comparing the performance of fully automated container terminals during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 14(15), 9415. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159415

Kim, S.-K., Choi, S., & Kim, C. (2021). The framework for measuring port resilience in Korean port case. Sustainability, 13(21), 11883. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111883

Liao, Y.-H., & Lee, H.-S. (2023). Using a directional distance function to measure the environmental efficiency of international liner shipping companies and assess regulatory impact. Sustainability, 15(4), 3821. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043821

Paridaens, H., & Notteboom, T. (2021). National integrated maritime policies (IMP): Vision formulation, regional embeddedness, and institutional attributes for effective policy integration. Sustainability, 13(17), 9557. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179557

Pian, F., Xu, L., Chen, Y., & Lee, S.-H. (2020). Global emission taxes and port privatization policies under international competition. Sustainability, 12(16), 6595. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166595

Qi, J., Wang, S., & Zheng, J. (2022). Shore power deployment problem—A case study of a Chinese container shipping network. Sustainability, 14(11), 6928. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116928

Yao, Y., Zheng, R., & Parmak, M. (2021). Examining the constraints on yachting tourism development in China: A qualitative study of stakeholder perceptions. Sustainability, 13(23), 13178. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313178

Zhang, W., Zhang, Y., & Qiao, W. (2022). Risk scenario evaluation for intelligent ships by mapping hierarchical holographic modeling into risk filtering, ranking and management. Sustainability, 14(4), 2103. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042103

Zhou, K., Yuan, X., Guo, Z., Wu, J., & Li, R. (2024). Research on sustainable port: Evaluation of green port policies on China's coasts. Sustainability, 16(10), 4017. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16104017

Zhu, J., Yan, W., He, J., Hafeez, M., & Sohail, S. (2024). Exploring the convergence of ICT, digital financial inclusion, environmental pressures, and free trade and their significance in driving sustainable green investment initiatives under carbon neutrality targets. Heliyon, 10(11), e31102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31102

Downloads

Published

2026-06-15

How to Cite

Tri Kismantoro. (2026). Capital Allocation Strategies for Fleet Decarbonization: A Financial Risk-Return Analysis of Alternative Fuel Investment Among Global Shipping Enterprises. MANABIS: Jurnal Manajemen Dan Bisnis, 5(2), 408–417. https://doi.org/10.54259/manabis.v5i2.7277

Issue

Section

Articles