Hubungan Kegagalan Tata Kelola dan Pelanggaran Etika Bisnis terhadap Reputasi Kinerja Keuangan & Non-Keuangan Perusahaan: Studi Kasus PT Shell
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54259/manabis.v4i4.5939Keywords:
Business Ethics, Corporate Reputation, Performance, Corporate GovernanceAbstract
This study aims to analyze the impact of business ethics violations on the reputation and performance of PT Shell, by identifying the forms of violations that occur and the mechanism of their impact on the company's financial and non-financial aspects. The research uses a qualitative approach with a case study design. Data was collected through documentation studies of annual reports, media coverage, government institution reports, as well as in-depth interviews with key informants consisting of former PT Shell officials, energy market analysts, and senior journalists. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis techniques. The results reveal that PT Shell faced various business ethics violations, primarily in the areas of corporate governance (corruption), operational safety (fires and oil spills), and community relations (social and environmental conflicts). These violations functioned as negative signals that significantly damaged the company's reputation, reflected in declining trust from the public, investors, and other stakeholders. The impact on company performance was complex, including direct financial losses (fines, cleanup costs) and indirect losses (project delays, increased cost of capital), as well as non-financial losses such as decreased employee morale, worsened relations with regulators, and increased resistance from communities. It is concluded that there is a strong causal relationship between business ethics violations, reputation decline, and performance decline of PT Shell. This research confirms that ethical integrity and the strong implementation of Good Corporate Governance are not a cost burden, but rather a strategic asset and critical investment for protecting reputation and ensuring sustainable company performance.
Downloads
References
Amran, A., Zain, M., Sulaiman, M., Sarker, T., & Ooi, S. K. (2013). EMPOWERING SOCIETY FOR BETTER CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (CSR): THE CASE OF MALAYSIA (Vol. 31, Issue 1).
Anatan, L., Staff, M. S., Fakultas, P., Universitas, E., & Maranatha, K. (n.d.). CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (CSR): Tinjauan Teoritis dan Praktik di Indonesia.
Ariefianto, L. (n.d.). PROGRAM CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (CSR) PT SEMEN INDONESIA Tbk DAN DAMPAKNYA TERHADAP KEBERDAYAAN MASYARAKAT.
Besar, G. (2010). IMPLEMENTASI KEBIJAKAN: Apa, Mengapa, dan Bagaimana HAEDAR AKIB. In Haedar Akib/ Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Vol. 1, Issue 1).
David, O. (2012). An assessment of the impact of corporate social responsibility on Nigerian society: The examples of banking and communication industries. In Universal Journal of Marketing and Business Research (Vol. 1, Issue 1). http://www.universalresearchjournals.org/ujmbr
Dobers, P., & Halme, M. (2009). Corporate social responsibility and developing countries. In Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management (Vol. 16, Issue 5, pp. 237–249). https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.212
George, R. (n.d.). Kebijakan dan Manajemen Publik Implementasi Corporate Social Responsibility di PT. Pembangkit Jawa Bali Unit Pembangkit Gresik. http://www.rudiatko.wordpress.com/2009/03/0
Ririh, K. R., Wicaksono, A., Berliandaldo, M., & Ajie, F. T. (2021). KAJIAN EFEKTIVITAS PROGRAM CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (CSR): STUDI KASUS PERUSAHAAN PEMBANGKIT ENERGI “Y.” J@ti Undip : Jurnal Teknik Industri, 16(1), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.14710/jati.16.1.29-41
Susanto AB Corporate Social Responsibility The Jakarta Consulting Group. 2007 Jakarta. (n.d.).
Akhbar, A., Miranda, A., Fahrezi, A.N., & Jannah, M. (2020). Analisis Dampak Sistem Multipartai dalam Implementasi Sistem Presidensil di Era Jokowi & Jusuf Kalla. The Journalish: Social and Government, 1(1), 28-32.
Aziz, A. A. (1999). Neo-Modernisme Islam di Indonesia: Gagasan Sentral Nurcholish Madjid dan Abdurrahman Wahid. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Benny, Georgius dan Maharani, Anindya Putri. (2024). Implikasi Sistem Multipartai terhadap Oposisi di Indonesia: Analisis Hasil Pemilu 2024 dengan Indeks ENPP. NeoRespublica: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 5(2), 1014–1030.
Cheibub, J. A. (2007). Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, and Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Effendy, B. (1998). Islam dan Negara: Transformasi Gagasan dan Praktik Politik Islam di Indonesia. Jakarta: Paramadina.
Efriza. (2022). Analisis Kemunduran Demokrasi Pada Pengelolaan Satu Setengah Tahun Pemerintahan Joko Widodo-Ma’ruf Amin. Journal of Government and Social Issues, 2(11), 109-131.
Fariz, Donal. (2019). Pemerintahan Jokowi dan Serangan Politik terhadap KPK. INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 5(2), 19-33.
Gaus AF, Ahmad. (2010). Api Islam Nurcholish Madjid: Jalan Hidup Seorang Visioner. Jakarta: Penerbit Buku Kompas.
Hakim, M. A. L., Darmawan, C., & Anggraeni, L. (2019). Demokrasi Minim Oposisi: Narasi Maha Puitis Sejarah Atas Reduksi Oposisi. Jurnal Education and Development, 10(3), 647–683.
Hidayatulloh, Taufik dan Muna, Izzu. (2024). Corak Pemikiran Nurcholish Madjid dalam Bingkai Politik Kebangsaan di Indonesia. Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, 7(3), 551-561.
Indrayana, D. (2008). Negara Antara Ada dan Tiada: Reformasi Hukum Ketatanegaraan. Jakarta: Kompas.
Lafuil, Abdul Kadir dan Umar, Kusnadi. (2022). Kedudukan Partai Oposisi terhadap Keberlangsungan Demokrasi dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Jurnal Al Tasyri’iyyah, 2(2), 96-107.
Liyanto, David Cristian. (2024). Kedudukan Partai Oposisi dalam Mewujudkan “Check and Balance” di Politik Hukum Indonesia. Jurnal Analisis Hukum, 7(2): 131-142.
Madjid, N. (1994). Demokratisasi Politik, Budaya, dan Ekonomi: Pengalaman Indonesia Masa Orde Baru. Jakarta: Yayasan Wakaf Paramadina
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Moch Herdin Batistuta Akbar, Widuri Octavianunisa, Adi Lukman Hakim
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
