Implementasi Pendekatan PDIA dalam Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar dan Kemampuan Berpikir Komputasional Siswa SMK Kelas X pada Mata Pelajaran Koding dan Kecerdasan Artifisial

Authors

  • Laela Muliana Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Tri Rijanto Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Luthfiyah Nurlaela Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • I Gusti Putu Asto Buditjahjanto Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Rommy Mochamad Ramdhani Universitas Negeri Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54259/diajar.v5i2.6499

Keywords:

Problem Driven Iterative Adaptation (PDIA), Learning Motivation, Computational Thinking, Coding, Classroom Action Research (PTK)

Abstract

This study aims to enhance the learning motivation and computational thinking skills of grade X SMK (Vocational High School) students in the subjects of Coding and Artificial Intelligence through the implementation of the Problem Driven Iterative Adaptation (PDIA) approach. Conducted as a Classroom Action Research (PTK) at SMKN 1 Penajam Paser Utara during the 2025/2026 academic year with 36 student participants, the study utilized the Kemmis and McTaggart action research model, which consists of planning based on identifying real-world problems, implementing contextual problem-solving activities, observation using instruments, questionnaires, and computational thinking tests, as well as in-depth reflection to evaluate and refine subsequent actions, carried out over two cycles. Data collection techniques included observation, learning motivation questionnaires, and computational thinking ability tests. The results indicate that the application of the PDIA approach significantly improved students' learning motivation and computational thinking skills. Student learning mastery increased from 50% in the pre-action phase to 63.89% in Cycle I, and further rose to 91.67% in Cycle II, with the class average score reaching 82.58. Additionally, student learning motivation showed improvement, marked by increased activity, enthusiasm, and engagement in the learning process. Therefore, it can be concluded that the PDIA approach is effective in enhancing both learning motivation and computational thinking skills among students in the subjects of Coding and Artificial Intelligence.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Laela Muliana, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Saya mengajar di SMKN 1 Penajam Paser Utara. Saya adalah guru produktif teknik jaringan komputer dan telekomunikasi.

References

Sinaga, D., et al. Teacher-Student Interaction Models: Effective Strategies for Increasing Student Participation and Motivation. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 26(3), 2023. DOI:10.21009/jtp.v26i3.50372

Pratama, B., et al. Pengaruh Kemampuan Interaksi Guru Dalam Pembelajaran Terhadap Motivasi Belajar Siswa. Innovative: Journal of Social Science Research, 4(2), 2377–2387, 2024. DOI:10.31004/innovative.v4i2.9710.

Ryan, R., et al. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 2020. DOI:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860

B. Nabilah., “Analisis Penerapan Mata Pelajaran Informatika dalam Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka Tingkat SMP,” Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, vol. 1, pp. 110–119, 2022.

Christina, D. Efektivitas pembelajaran coding terhadap kemampuan computational thinking, problem solving, dan matematika siswa. EDUTECH: Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 23(3), 289–306, 2024.

Irawan., et al. Promoting computational thinking through programming trends, tools, and educational approaches: A systematic review. JTAM: Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika, Volume issue, pages. https://journal.ummat.ac.id/index.php/jtam/article/view/26407 , 2025.

Nana., et al. The effectiveness of implementing project-based learning (PjBL) model in STEM education: A literature review. Computers & Education, 196, 104721. 2021. DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/1882/1/012146

Kathy., et al. Coding and Computational Thinking Across the Curriculum: A Review of Educational Outcomes. Volume 95, Issue 3, June 2025, Pages 581-618. DOI : https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543241241327

Wardani, A. D. Computational Thinking: Definisi dan Penerapan dalam Pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 12(1), 33–45. 2022

Roy., et al. A Comprehensive Analysis on Computational Thinking in Education: Open Issues and Challenges. Engineering Proceedings, 107(1), 6, 2025. doi:10.3390/engproc2025107006

ISTE, Computational Thinking Competencies for Educators. Washington, DC, USA: International Society for Technology in Education, 2022.

Y.-P. Cheng., “Enhancing students’ computational thinking skills with student-generated questions strategy in a game-based learning platform,” Computers & Education, 2023, doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104794.

Herlambang.,et al. Students’ Cognitive Load on Computer Programming Instructional Process Using Example-Problem-Based Learning and Problem-Based Learning Instructional Model at Vocational High School. Elinvo (Electronics, Informatics, and Vocational Education), Jurnal Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, 9(2), 309–320, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/elinvo.v9i2.57882

Adi., et al. Analisa dan Perancangan E-Learning Pembelajaran Pemrograman Dasar Kelas X SMK. Jurnal Penelitian Teknologi Pendidikan.2020 http://jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id/teknodika

Agung W., et al. Hubungan Antara Literasi TIK dan Motivasi Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa SMK. SAP (Susunan Artikel Pendidikan). 2549-2845, 2022.

Maulidyawati and Irham, “Media Pendidikan Matematika: Penerapan Problem Driven Iterative Adaptation (PDIA) untuk Mengatasi Kesulitan Belajar Matematika Siswa SDN 2 Pungkit,” Universitas Teknologi Sumbawa, 2020. [Online]. Available: http://ojs.ikipmataram.ac.id/index.php/jmpm

Wong., et al. Engaging children in developing algorithmic thinking and debugging skills in primary schools: A mixed-methods multiple case study. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 16205–16254, 2024.

Katharina., et al. Adaptive learning, instruction, and teaching in schools: Unraveling context, sources, implementation, and goals in a systematic review. 2025, 102781. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102781

Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Pendidikan, 5th ed. Bandung, Indonesia: Alfabeta, 2022.

S. Kemmis, R. McTaggart, and R. Nixon, The Action Research Planner: Doing Critical Participatory Action Research, 4th ed. Singapore: Springer, 2021.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-15

How to Cite

Laela Muliana, Tri Rijanto, Luthfiyah Nurlaela, I Gusti Putu Asto Buditjahjanto, & Rommy Mochamad Ramdhani. (2026). Implementasi Pendekatan PDIA dalam Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar dan Kemampuan Berpikir Komputasional Siswa SMK Kelas X pada Mata Pelajaran Koding dan Kecerdasan Artifisial. DIAJAR: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 5(2), 391–399. https://doi.org/10.54259/diajar.v5i2.6499

Issue

Section

Articles